Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics

NHL draft should be reason for pretenders to coast home Options
henwood
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:24:47 AM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 395
Points: 1,088

Apparently, there are a few teams that didn't get the memo.  You know, the one that says if you have sucked for most of the year, chances are you do indeed suck. A fruitless, late-season ride does little to change that.

So, why not just ride out the storm, string together a few more losses honest efforts, head to the draft, take a pick-of-the-litter draft choice and smile.

OK, I won't go as far as to use the word "tank", per se, but there's no harm easing the foot off the gas pedal a tad. Use the backup, play the rookies, pull a star player out of the lineup and blame it on, uh, let's see, a tweaked groin.

Never mind a spirited, ill-advised run for a playoff spot that falls achingly short or, in a best-case scenario, yields the last invitation to the ball only to...

Read Full Post: NHL draft should be reason for pretenders to coast home

Back to top
 
phillyphan77
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:08:36 PM
Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/10/2008
Posts: 53
Points: 159
There is no reason to tank and in fact it is bending the rules. Take your lumps and draft right. Every team should be shooting for a playoff spot until they are mathetmatially eliminated and even after then you should be out to win every game. Tanking is for loser franchises.
Back to top
 
bleedinblue
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:29:19 PM
Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/22/2008
Posts: 33
Points: 99
Agreed. The Leafs should have tanked a month ago. Now they'll get stuck with a pick that may or may not have NHL potential down the road.

When will they ever learn?
Back to top
 
couchman
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 7:33:15 PM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/31/2007
Posts: 166
Points: 254
Bending the rules is pretty common-place in the current NHL. Teams that are sucking late in the season often play more of their youth and backup goalies.
Back to top
 
hashmark
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:01:24 PM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/10/2007
Posts: 56
Points: 168
couchman wrote:
Bending the rules is pretty common-place in the current NHL. Teams that are sucking late in the season often play more of their youth and backup goalies.


Exactly, if a team is a lost cause, why not pack it in? This season is a lost cause, so move on to next. Pretty common sense really.
Back to top
 
henwood
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:09:56 PM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 395
Points: 1,088
phillyphan77 wrote:
There is no reason to tank and in fact it is bending the rules. Take your lumps and draft right. Every team should be shooting for a playoff spot until they are mathetmatially eliminated and even after then you should be out to win every game. Tanking is for loser franchises.


Actually, it isn't. Bending the rules is deliberately throwing games, a ala the 1919 Black Sox scandal. All I am suggesting is to play your rookies and backup goaltender a little more. After all, the rookies are your future, so why not see what they can do in a no-pressure scenario?

It's a fine line, I know, but it is quite obvious more than a few teams are walking it.
Back to top
 
henwood
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:10:31 PM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 395
Points: 1,088
bleedinblue wrote:
Agreed. The Leafs should have tanked a month ago. Now they'll get stuck with a pick that may or may not have NHL potential down the road.

When will they ever learn?


2067? Centennial year?
Back to top
 
henwood
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:12:43 PM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 395
Points: 1,088
couchman wrote:
Bending the rules is pretty common-place in the current NHL. Teams that are sucking late in the season often play more of their youth and backup goalies.


And that is precisely my point. If everyone thinks that the teams lingering near the bottom of the league, as in five worst teams, are giving it their all, give your head a shake.
Back to top
 
HabsMom
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:34:11 PM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/6/2008
Posts: 17
Points: 51
Location: CA
I'd rather not have to worry about it. My Habs are contending for one of the top spots in the league and could go all the way to the Cup finals, again.

Draft-smaft. Isn't that what Fletcher once said last time in Toronto?
Back to top
 
thedude
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:00:52 PM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/4/2007
Posts: 30
Points: 90
henwood wrote:
couchman wrote:
Bending the rules is pretty common-place in the current NHL. Teams that are sucking late in the season often play more of their youth and backup goalies.


And that is precisely my point. If everyone thinks that the teams lingering near the bottom of the league, as in five worst teams, are giving it their all, give your head a shake.


But I thought it was all about parity? LOL
Back to top
 
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Fantasy Playoff Challenge - Over $15,000 in prizes! Free to play! Custom Pro NHL Hockey Jerseys