Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics

Would a "hockey tax" Help Our Arenas? Options
HockeyGal
Posted: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:25:11 AM
Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Administration , Member

Joined: 3/6/2008
Posts: 115
Points: -90
Location: CA
Did anyone read the sports section of The Star yesterday? There was an interesting article written by Rick Westhead called: Hockey tax would solve our arena problems.

Rick talks about how California has a sort of "jock tax" where any non-resident athletes must pay a state tax that is based on the amount of work related time they spend in that state during the period of a year. And California is one of about 20 states that are doing this.

So lets say PlayerA plays for the Maple Leafs but doesn't live in Toronto. He makes $28 million. According to California's jock tax he would be contributing roughly $200,000.

Westhead suggests this money could go a long way in helping to repair some of Canada's 3,000 hockey arenas that are in dilapidated condition.

So why hasn't Canada taken a hint and implemented this type of tax itself? Technically it has and it's known as Alberta NHL Players Tax. It went into effect at the start of the 2002-2003 NHL regular season. What Alberta is essentially doing is charging every NHL player who plays in Alberta 12.5% of their game day salary. This money is then split by the Edmonton Oilers and the Calgary Flames. It isn't a huge surprise that this tax has taken a lot of flak, not unlike most taxes.

The Alberta tax differs from the jock tax in that every player is taxed, not just non-residents. Alberta teams play the most at home so therefore are taxed more than visiting teams. Here is an example of how the tax works taken from the Canadian Tax Foundation: In 2003 Edmonton goaltender Tommy Salo who was set to make about US$3.5 million, will pay over $166,000 in players tax. A non-Albertan goalie like Curtis Joseph (2003) who makes US$8 million will pay about $26,000 or 0.2 percent of his total salary.

So what do you think? Should we implement a form of the jock tax? Or maybe take Alberta's route and implement that across Canada. Or maybe we take the best of both worlds and create something new. I do like Rick Westhead's suggestion in using that tax money to put it back into Canadian Hockey arenas. Or better yet Canadian hockey in general.
Back to top
 
PuckBunny22
Posted: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:23:50 AM

Rank: Hockey Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 32
Points: 96
So I'm surprised but I'm not surprised that the government would try to grab as much cash from people as they can. But I think that's a bit ridiculous.
Back to top
 
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You can create polls in this forum.
You can vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Rant, Rave, Win Prizes! Get your FREE My Hockey account now!